Abdul Muhammed Law Practice
Abdul Muhammed Law Practice’s Lead Lawyer Abdulateef Muhammed examines cross-border cryptocurrency transactions in the context of a pragmatic look at Nigerian Regulations in a global context.
Introduction
When innovation meets regulation as it is in the realm of cross-border cryptocurrency transactions one must then deal with both challenges and opportunities.
For Nigerian cryptocurrency sector players, understanding the nuances of cross-border transactions and how they might align with local regulations is crucial.
This article aims to provide a straightforward exploration of the Nigerian regulatory framework concerning cross-border cryptocurrency transactions, comparing it with other jurisdictions.
Nigerian cryptocurrency regulations
Nigeria is currently exhibiting a dynamic approach to cryptocurrency regulations with an acknowledgment of the transformative potential of blockchain technology.
The Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) has recognized cryptocurrencies by permitting banks to do business with VASPs but the CBN also has concerns about the potential for misuse, and we should anticipate that the hands on approach may lead to periodic regulatory adjustments.
Cross-border transactions
Nigeria, like many jurisdictions, grapples with providing precise guidelines for cross-border cryptocurrency transactions. The regulatory landscape here is characterized by a blend of cautious optimism and the need for risk mitigation.
Secondly, Nigerian cryptocurrency players engaging in cross-border transactions must adhere to AML and KYC protocols. These regulations are in line with global standards and are aimed at preventing illicit activities such as money laundering and terrorist financing.
Thirdly, Nigeria’s foreign exchange woes and regulations may impact cross-border cryptocurrency transactions. The CBN has, at times, issued directives restricting the flow of foreign currency, impacting the ability of crypto players to conduct transactions beyond borders. Staying abreast of the exchange rates and the CBN forex regulations is imperative.
Comparative analysis – United States
The U.S. regulatory landscape is a patchwork of federal and state-level regulations.
Federal agencies like the SEC and CFTC provide guidelines, but each state often has its own rules. There seems to be lack of clarity as to when a cryptocurrency is a store of value, a commodity of a security and this tends to affect the market. Clarity on the classification of cryptocurrencies as securities or commodities is essential for cross-border transactions.
Comparative analysis – European Union
The EU has been working towards a unified regulatory approach. The Markets in Crypto-Assets (MiCA) proposal aims to provide a comprehensive framework for the entire EU, enhancing legal certainty for cross-border crypto transactions.
Comparative analysis – Singapore
Known for its progressive stance, Singapore provides clear guidelines on licensing and compliance. The city-state’s Payment Services Act (PSA) regulates digital payment token services, offering a conducive environment for cross-border transactions.
Conclusion
The evolving Nigerian regulatory landscape calls for a proactive approach to stay compliant with local laws while keeping an eye on global developments.
As Nigeria refines its stance on cryptocurrency regulations, industry players should foster open dialogue with regulators to contribute to a framework that encourages growth and safeguards against potential risks in cross border cryptocurrency transactions.
Disclaimer: This article provides general information and does not constitute legal advice. Consult with a Nigerian cryptocurrency lawyer, a crypto competent lawyer in Nigeria or other legal professionals for advice tailored to your specific situation.
READ: Nigerian crypto law series 19: What consumer protection law are applicable in Nigeria?
